Triple
T18743113
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carrie Buck |
E458338
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCaseOutcomeForHer |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sterilization order upheld |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sterilization order upheld | Statement: [Carrie Buck, legalCaseOutcomeForHer, sterilization order upheld]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseOutcomeForHer Context triple: [Carrie Buck, legalCaseOutcomeForHer, sterilization order upheld]
-
A.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
C.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
D.
legalCaseRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
-
E.
legalCaseHeParticipatedInDecidedBy
Indicates that a legal case in which he participated was decided or adjudicated by a specified authority or court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d394dc308190b6725073f5db324c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e57690a4d081908ab4c3890bb07e86 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d03766c8190a43f7681842f4f8d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:51 a.m.