Triple

T1793183
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Atari deep Q-network E39543 entity
Predicate usesLossFunction P31982 FINISHED
Object temporal-difference error LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: temporal-difference error | Statement: [Atari deep Q-network, usesLossFunction, temporal-difference error]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesLossFunction
Context triple: [Atari deep Q-network, usesLossFunction, temporal-difference error]
  • A. lostFunction
    Indicates that an entity no longer possesses or can perform a function or capability it previously had.
  • B. usesComputationMethod
    Indicates that an entity performs its processing or decision-making by applying a specified computational method or algorithm.
  • C. activationFunction
    Indicates the specific mathematical transformation applied to a neuron's input to produce its output in a computational or neural model.
  • D. losses
    Indicates that an entity experiences a decrease in value, quantity, or advantage as a result of some event or comparison.
  • E. actualUse
    Indicates that an entity is currently being used or utilized in practice, as opposed to being merely available, planned, or potential.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88631854081909723959921e45c2b completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ab61b6ea188190aab9fb839bf1e367 completed March 6, 2026, 11:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61d2f7a8819090301f92d3e358c7 completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ab61b5c8988190bb2b46182a4eb5b4 completed March 6, 2026, 11:22 p.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.