Triple
T17287264
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | EMD F40PH |
E419690
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterPowerOutputVariant |
P94210
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 3200 hp |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 3200 hp | Statement: [EMD F40PH, laterPowerOutputVariant, 3200 hp]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterPowerOutputVariant Context triple: [EMD F40PH, laterPowerOutputVariant, 3200 hp]
-
A.
laterPowerOutput
chosen
Indicates that the power output of an entity at a later time is being related or compared to its power output at an earlier time.
-
B.
laterPowerplant
Indicates that one power plant occurs, is built, or becomes operational at a later time than another power plant.
-
C.
hasHybridPowerOutput
Indicates that an entity possesses a power output characteristic derived from or involving a hybrid (multi-source) power system.
-
D.
powerplantVariant
Indicates that one power plant is a specific version, configuration, or model variant of another power plant design.
-
E.
hasLowPowerVariant
Indicates that an entity has a related version or configuration designed to operate with reduced power consumption compared to the standard one.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886db32608190a61e18862c5a8af6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e43780fad88190b82193c8335e2f11 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b0118ad08190b119cd219c68ba67 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:40 a.m.