Triple
T16294877
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pierce v. Society of Sisters |
E395620
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Meyer v. Nebraska |
E1140385
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Meyer v. Nebraska | Statement: [Pierce v. Society of Sisters, relatedCase, Meyer v. Nebraska]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Meyer v. Nebraska Context triple: [Pierce v. Society of Sisters, relatedCase, Meyer v. Nebraska]
-
A.
Meyer v. Nebraska
chosen
Meyer v. Nebraska is a 1923 U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized substantive due process protections for individual liberties, including parents’ rights to control their children’s education and teachers’ rights to teach foreign languages.
-
B.
Coppage v. Kansas
Coppage v. Kansas is a 1915 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law banning “yellow-dog” contracts, reflecting the Lochner-era emphasis on freedom of contract over labor protections.
-
C.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
-
D.
De Jonge v. Oregon
De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
-
E.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f22c7248190a54c949738441e2e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e25e2d08108190bab1b3325923af1d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a001f9965b8819080278ccef15288aa |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:05 a.m.