Meyer v. Nebraska
E1140385
UNEXPLORED
Meyer v. Nebraska is a 1923 U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized substantive due process protections for individual liberties, including parents’ rights to control their children’s education and teachers’ rights to teach foreign languages.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Meyer v. Nebraska canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T15157051 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Meyer v. Nebraska Context triple: [Prince v. Massachusetts, relatedCase, Meyer v. Nebraska]
-
A.
Coppage v. Kansas
Coppage v. Kansas is a 1915 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law banning “yellow-dog” contracts, reflecting the Lochner-era emphasis on freedom of contract over labor protections.
-
B.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
-
C.
De Jonge v. Oregon
De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
-
D.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
E.
McGirt v. Oklahoma
McGirt v. Oklahoma is a landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed much of eastern Oklahoma remains Native American reservation land for purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Meyer v. Nebraska Target entity description: Meyer v. Nebraska is a 1923 U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized substantive due process protections for individual liberties, including parents’ rights to control their children’s education and teachers’ rights to teach foreign languages.
-
A.
Coppage v. Kansas
Coppage v. Kansas is a 1915 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law banning “yellow-dog” contracts, reflecting the Lochner-era emphasis on freedom of contract over labor protections.
-
B.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
-
C.
De Jonge v. Oregon
De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
-
D.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
E.
McGirt v. Oklahoma
McGirt v. Oklahoma is a landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed much of eastern Oklahoma remains Native American reservation land for purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.