Triple
T15999539
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GD-ROM |
E388059
|
entity |
| Predicate | compatibleWithStandardCDDrives |
P34359
|
FINISHED |
| Object | partially |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: partially | Statement: [GD-ROM, compatibleWithStandardCDDrives, partially]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compatibleWithStandardCDDrives Context triple: [GD-ROM, compatibleWithStandardCDDrives, partially]
-
A.
compatibleStand
Indicates that one entity can be properly supported or held by another entity’s stand or mounting system.
-
B.
hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
chosen
Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
-
C.
compatibleSign
Indicates that two entities are considered astrologically harmonious or well-matched based on their zodiac signs.
-
D.
isGenerallyCompatibleWith
Indicates that two entities can typically function or coexist together without significant conflict, issues, or need for special adaptation.
-
E.
possibleDriver
Indicates that an entity is a candidate or potential driver of another entity, such as a possible cause, regulator, or influencing factor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86daa562c81908aacc179c0fe8fb5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e173b3bf6c81909230170e833d7ce7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142dc081c819082527e3fa8773460 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:55 a.m.