Triple

T14766465
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Conquest of Egypt E347008 entity
Predicate opposingCommander P1698 FINISHED
Object Psamtik III E164161 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Psamtik III | Statement: [Conquest of Egypt, opposingCommander, Psamtik III]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Psamtik III
Context triple: [Conquest of Egypt, opposingCommander, Psamtik III]
  • A. Psamtik III chosen
    Psamtik III was the last pharaoh of Egypt’s 26th Dynasty, whose brief reign ended with the Persian conquest under Cambyses II.
  • B. Psamtik II
    Psamtik II was a pharaoh of Egypt’s 26th Dynasty known for his military campaigns, especially against Nubia, and for consolidating Saite power.
  • C. Psamtik I
    Psamtik I was a 7th-century BCE pharaoh who reunified Egypt and founded the Saite (26th) Dynasty, ushering in a period of political stability and cultural revival.
  • D. Nectanebo II
    Nectanebo II was the last native pharaoh of ancient Egypt, ruling during the 30th Dynasty and known for his extensive temple building and resistance against Persian reconquest.
  • E. Nectanebo I
    Nectanebo I was a pharaoh of Egypt’s 30th Dynasty known for restoring native Egyptian rule, extensive temple building, and resisting Persian domination during the Late Period.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822e8896c819091169882f9b20486 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dec7f576c881909da70627f5897c94 completed April 14, 2026, 11:04 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fe388aeb9c819099a987a819959479 completed May 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:30 a.m.