Triple
T10698294
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zimbabwean general election, 2008 |
E252201
|
entity |
| Predicate | accusationsByOpposition |
P38117
|
FINISHED |
| Object | vote rigging |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: vote rigging | Statement: [Zimbabwean general election, 2008, accusationsByOpposition, vote rigging]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: accusationsByOpposition Context triple: [Zimbabwean general election, 2008, accusationsByOpposition, vote rigging]
-
A.
accusationsAddressed
Indicates that previously made accusations have been responded to, dealt with, or otherwise handled by a relevant party.
-
B.
allegedByOpponents
chosen
Indicates that a claim or accusation is made by opponents of the subject.
-
C.
parliamentaryOppositionTo
Indicates that one party, group, or member within a parliamentary system formally opposes the policies, actions, or proposals of another.
-
D.
oppositionActivity
Indicates that one entity engages in actions or behaviors that resist, counter, or work against another entity, its goals, or its activities.
-
E.
hasAllegationsOf
Indicates that one entity is accused or suspected of engaging in certain actions, behaviors, or misconduct, but without implying that these accusations are proven.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5cbabc8190973e683950d89faf |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6fd8a03848190bf68dd470bee103a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6dd8cc0788190b4c02a772e4b58b3 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:12 p.m.