Triple
T10205182
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Convention de Washington |
E242173
|
entity |
| Predicate | fondementJuridique |
P125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | consentement des États parties |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consentement des États parties | Statement: [Convention de Washington, fondementJuridique, consentement des États parties]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fondementJuridique Context triple: [Convention de Washington, fondementJuridique, consentement des États parties]
-
A.
legalBasis
chosen
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
B.
foundationInLaw
Indicates that something is based on, justified by, or derives its authority from a specific law or legal framework.
-
C.
legalAuthorityIn
Indicates that an entity holds official legal power, jurisdiction, or governing authority within a specified area or domain.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
featuresLaw
Indicates that something includes, presents, or is characterized by a particular law or legal provision.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381ae26c48190985abd0e25ee5d04 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d3aa22071c819095febd18dd607978 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 12:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d39559e5ac8190b88eca75956b7e6a |
completed | April 6, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 10:42 a.m.