|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:addresses
|
discrimination based on sexual orientation
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2018
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:example
|
conflict between personal beliefs and public policy
|
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for
|
gptkb:business_practices
gptkb:social_justice
artistic expression
business owners' rights
customers' rights
future cases involving LGBTQ+ rights
|
|
gptkbp:has_influenced
|
state legislation
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
same-sex marriage cake case
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission
|
|
gptkbp:involves_the_issue_of
|
freedom of speech
religious freedom
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_examines
|
the role of personal beliefs in business
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_explores
|
the limits of free speech
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_been_analyzed_in
|
legal journals
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_been_discussed_in
|
social media
law schools
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_been_featured_in
|
news articles
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_been_the_focus_of
|
community activism
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_been_the_subject_of
|
public protests
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_implications_for
|
future legal precedents
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_influenced
|
gptkb:public_opinion
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_led_to
|
calls for clearer laws
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_prompted
|
gptkb:legal_reforms
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_case_that_has_resulted_in
|
increased awareness of LGBTQ+ issues
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_subject_of
|
gptkb:books
gptkb:documentaries
academic papers
public accommodation laws
|
|
gptkbp:is_analyzed_in
|
legal scholars
|
|
gptkbp:is_associated_with
|
gptkb:freedom_of_religion
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
subsequent legal discussions
|
|
gptkbp:is_debated_in
|
legislative bodies
public forums
courtrooms
|
|
gptkbp:is_often_discussed_in
|
the Obergefell v. Hodges case
|
|
gptkbp:is_often_referenced_in
|
legal arguments
|
|
gptkbp:is_part_of_a_larger_context_of
|
gptkb:LGBTQ+_rights_movement
|
|
gptkbp:is_referenced_in
|
gptkb:political_discussions
|
|
gptkbp:is_related_to
|
civil rights
|
|
gptkbp:is_viewed_as_a_test_case_for
|
religious exemptions
|
|
gptkbp:landmark
|
U. S. legal history
|
|
gptkbp:notable_case
|
civil liberties
|
|
gptkbp:reported_by
|
gptkb:media_outlets
|
|
gptkbp:resulted_in
|
a 7-2 decision
|
|
gptkbp:sparked
|
public debate
|
|
gptkbp:was_influenced_by
|
First Amendment rights
state anti-discrimination laws
|
|
gptkbp:was_involved_in
|
government regulation
the concept of public interest
the tension between rights
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Masterpiece_Cakeshop
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|