Properties (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
reinstatement_of_Wieman
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 57
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Oklahoma
unconstitutional dismissal |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 30, 1958 |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
gptkb:post-World_War_II_America
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Wieman v. Updegraff
|
| gptkbp:impact |
academic freedom
|
| gptkbp:involved |
Updegraff
Wieman |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Harlan
majority opinion favored free speech |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Cold War era
due process important for public employment law First_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruled_in_favor_of_Wieman
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Brennan
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
freedom of speech
influenced future cases on academic freedom |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkb:Sweezy_v._New_Hampshire employment discrimination civil rights public interest academic integrity academic standards government accountability legal interpretation constitutional law judicial review case law civil liberties freedom of expression intellectual freedom educational policy employment rights freedom of association political speech judicial precedent academic governance constitutional protections free speech rights academic tenure freedom of inquiry higher education law political affiliation academic rights academic independence government employment academic freedom protections state action public university policies First_Amendment_jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:significance |
protection of academic speech
|