Statements (22)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:appealsTo |
VidAngel appealed
|
| gptkbp:date |
2019
|
| gptkbp:defendant |
gptkb:VidAngel,_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:destroyedBy |
$62.4 million
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
2016
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
VidAngel v. Disney
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Andre_Birotte_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Central_District_of_California
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
legality of filtering copyrighted content
streaming technology and copyright law |
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
gptkb:Disney_Enterprises,_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:relatedOrganization |
gptkb:20th_Century_Fox
gptkb:Warner_Bros. gptkb:Lucasfilm_Ltd. |
| gptkbp:result |
VidAngel found liable for copyright infringement
VidAngel ordered to pay damages |
| gptkbp:subject |
copyright infringement
Digital Millennium Copyright Act violation Family Movie Act interpretation |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Angel_Studios
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|