|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:AT&_T_Corp._v._Iowa_Utilities_Board
|
|
gptkbp:area
|
telecommunications law
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
influenced future FCC policies
prompted legislative proposals on internet regulation
highlighted the role of the FCC in internet governance
affected broadband access policies
contributed to the debate on digital divide
influenced state-level net neutrality laws
inspired advocacy for consumer protections
led to further litigation on net neutrality
raised questions about broadband classification
shaped net neutrality discussions
sparked public debate on internet access
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 14, 2014
|
|
gptkbp:historical_debate
|
January 15, 2014
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
consumer rights
internet service providers
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:Federal_Communications_Commission
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
740 F.3d 623 (D. C. Cir. 2014)
|
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in
|
gptkb:Federal_Communications_Commission
gptkb:Verizon_Communications_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
gptkb:Administrative_Procedure_Act
First Amendment rights
FCC's regulatory authority
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
gptkb:Communications_Act_of_1934
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
upheld FCC's authority
affirmed FCC's rules
rejected Verizon's claims
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Brand_X_Internet_Services_v._FCC
gptkb:National_Cable_&_Telecommunications_Association_v._Brand_X_Internet_Services
future telecommunications regulations
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:Open_Internet_Order
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
net neutrality
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2014
|