Unjust Enrichment in Australia
GPTKB entity
Statements (34)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:academicCommentaryBy |
gptkb:James_Edelman
Elise Bant Kit Barker |
| gptkbp:basisFor |
unjust enrichment
|
| gptkbp:contrastsWith |
tort law
contract law |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Unjust Enrichment in Australia
|
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
English law of unjust enrichment
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Australia
|
| gptkbp:leadingCase |
David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353
Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221 |
| gptkbp:recognizedBy |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
restitution
|
| gptkbp:remedy |
restitution
personal remedy proprietary remedy |
| gptkbp:remedyMayBeBarredBy |
estoppel
set-off bona fide purchase change of position passing on defence |
| gptkbp:requiresElement |
enrichment
at the expense of the plaintiff unjust factor |
| gptkbp:subjectOf |
legal scholarship
judicial debate |
| gptkbp:unjustFactorExamples |
duress
illegality mistake failure of consideration |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:James_Edelman
gptkb:Sir_James_Edelman |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|