Properties (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
sentencing
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
19-2020 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
No. 19-2020
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
future cases
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
affirmed majority opinion |
| gptkbp:date |
March 2020
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
history of the case
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
background information
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Zukerman
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal justice system
impact on future rulings |
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States_government
defendant_Zukerman |
| gptkbp:judges |
panel of judges
dissenting views reviewed by legal experts |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
due process |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defense attorney
prosecutor |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
federal law
insufficient evidence misapplication of law context of the law framework of the law significant for legal practice terms used in case |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
legal analysis
affects sentencing guidelines implications for future cases important for legal scholars implications for defendants significant for legal precedents relevant case law summary of facts official court documents analysis of the ruling court documentation available detailed analysis of case implications for sentencing relevant to current law relevant to legal studies specifics of the case |
| gptkbp:outcome |
legal precedent
upheld conviction upheld by appellate court appeal decision upheld by higher court final ruling final decision by court |
| gptkbp:precedent |
case law
established legal precedent |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith
|