Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
gptkb:U.S._Court_of_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
upheld lower court's decision
influenced future litigation limited access to evidence reaffirmed executive privilege |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 20-827
|
| gptkbp:court |
reaffirmed state secrets doctrine
|
| gptkbp:date |
June 2022
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:filedIn |
gptkb:U.S._District_Court
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
post-9/11 legal landscape
interrogation techniques debate U.S._counterterrorism_policy |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Zubaydah
|
| gptkbp:impact |
future cases regarding state secrets
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Abu_Zubaydah
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Amy_Coney_Barrett gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Clarence Thomas |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
analyzed by legal scholars
discussed in law reviews examined by human rights organizations scrutinized by the public debated_in_Congress |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
war on terror state secrets privilege affects civil liberties affects executive power affects intelligence community limited disclosure of information |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
extensive media coverage
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Supreme_Court_ruling
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:United_States_government
Abu_Zubaydah's_legal_team |
| gptkbp:precedent |
related legal precedents
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
controversial ruling
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Zubaydah_v._Obama
gptkb:Al-Aulaqi_v._Obama Mohammed_v._Obama |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:CIA_interrogation_program
|
| gptkbp:significance |
national security implications
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
February 2022
|
| gptkbp:year |
2022
|