Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:EFF
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
Yahoo! appealed the decision
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil case
CV-06-1925 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
2007-01-18
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Yahoo!
|
| gptkbp:impact |
internet companies
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
post-9/11 security policies
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Yahoo!_Inc.
gptkb:United_States_government |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Yahoo! and the United States
|
| gptkbp:issues |
data privacy
government surveillance |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Jeremy_Fogel
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
data retention privacy rights Fourth Amendment rights digital communication laws |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:political_movement
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
USAPATRIOT Act
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive media coverage
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
In re: Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
analyzed by legal scholars
led to policy changes in data handling prompted discussions on user consent increased scrutiny of tech companies used in law school curricula raised awareness of digital rights Yahoo! compliance with law enforcement requests Yahoo! faced backlash from users Yahoo! faced legal challenges Yahoo! must provide user data Yahoo! ordered to comply with subpoenas highlighted tensions between privacy and security influenced future legislation on data privacy shaped user privacy expectations upheld government requests |
| gptkbp:precedent |
set precedent for future cases
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
controversial
|
| gptkbp:published_year |
2006-03-01
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Electronic_Communications_Privacy_Act
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on digital privacy
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2007
|