|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit
upheld dismissal
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
1:13-cv-03994-WHP
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
influenced public policy
debate on privacy rights
upheld government surveillance
shaped future litigation
increased scrutiny of NSA
heightened awareness of digital privacy
influenced public opinion on surveillance
inspired further lawsuits
legislative reforms proposed
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:National_Security_Agency
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2015-09-02
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
court ruled against the plaintiffs
|
|
gptkbp:historical_figures
|
gptkb:James_Clapper
gptkb:Edward_Snowden
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. National Security Agency
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
public awareness of surveillance
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
government agencies
civil liberties organizations
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_William_H._Pauley_III
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
national security concerns
post-9/11 security measures
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
surveillance practices
unconstitutional surveillance
lack of probable cause
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
standing to sue
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:ACLU_Foundation
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act
gptkb:USA_PATRIOT_Act
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:New_York_City
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
dismissed
case dismissed on technical grounds
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Fourth Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
controversial
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Smith_v._Maryland
|
|
gptkbp:related_event
|
gptkb:Snowden_revelations
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
privacy concerns
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2015
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:EFF
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|