|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
|
|
gptkbp:advocates_for
|
possible
|
|
gptkbp:analysis
|
varied opinions
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
civil
21-12345
|
|
gptkbp:community_engagement
|
high
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
gptkb:significant
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Medium,_Inc.
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2023-01-01
|
|
gptkbp:discovered_by
|
ongoing
|
|
gptkbp:duration
|
high
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Medium, Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
gptkb:technique
consumer rights
freedom of speech
social media regulations
digital advertising market
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Medium,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_venue_for
|
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_Smith
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
First Amendment rights
antitrust laws
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Police_Department
Medium, Inc. legal team
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act
gptkb:Antitrust_Improvement_Act
gptkb:Consumer_Privacy_Protection_Act
gptkb:Internet_Freedom_Act
gptkb:Communications_Decency_Act
|
|
gptkbp:major_city
|
not reached
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:movement
|
motion to dismiss
motion for summary judgment
|
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Google,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
active
pending
regulatory changes
policy reforms
legal precedents
increased scrutiny
market shifts
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Ability
Supreme Court decisions
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
divided
|
|
gptkbp:published_year
|
2022-12-15
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
2023-03-15
|
|
gptkbp:sponsor
|
government agencies
media organizations
private companies
legal experts
consumer advocacy groups
|