Properties (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
21-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
appeal
21-1234 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
gptkb:U.S._123_(2021)
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
set legal precedents
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
2021-03-15
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
majority opinion dissenting opinion |
| gptkbp:date |
2021-06-01
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2021
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
established new doctrine
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
numerous published
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
significant in legal history
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
documented thoroughly
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
rooted in prior rulings
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. McKinley
|
| gptkbp:impact |
shaped public policy
influenced law reforms |
| gptkbp:influence |
widespread implications
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:McKinley |
| gptkbp:judges |
analyzed extensively
Justice A Justice B Justice C subject of many reviews |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Attorney General
defense attorney widely discussed |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
constitutional law
impact on future cases recorded presented by both sides part of a series of cases |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
available online
important for legal scholars available in public records reviewed by experts continues to be relevant affects future rulings influences judicial behavior |
| gptkbp:outcome |
closed
affirmed reaffirmed existing laws precedent for similar cases |
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal principles
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
highly publicized
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Johnson
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith |