Statements (63)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
appeal
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
No. 19-1234
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
civil rights
constitutional law criminal justice system |
| gptkbp:controversy |
oral arguments
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
fair trial
due process self-incrimination double jeopardy |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. McKenna
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
McKenna |
| gptkbp:judges |
panel of judges
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defense attorney
prosecutor |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
legal rights
legal frameworks judicial review law students legal principles case law legal consequences legal protections legal scholars legal accountability legal precedents legal standards professional conduct legal remedies court procedures legal interpretations judicial decisions court rulings impact on future cases legal obligations court opinions legal ethics legal practitioners judicial accountability burden of proof constitutional interpretation legal implications statutory interpretation legal responsibility evidentiary standards judicial responsibility judicial outcomes judicial remedies judicial rights judicial principles judicial frameworks judicial obligations judicial protections legal_arguments |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal principles
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
precedent cases
|