Properties (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
yes
upheld |
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
remanded
appealed to higher court |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
3:05-cr-00012
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2006 WL 2038470
|
| gptkbp:class |
jury trial
|
| gptkbp:commanded |
imprisonment
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
standard instructions |
| gptkbp:date |
2006
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Judge
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Lentz
|
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States
Lentz |
| gptkbp:judges |
expert witnesses
guilty character witnesses lengthy |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
defense attorney fair trial due process influenced future cases right to counsel burden of proof reasonable doubt double jeopardy prosecutor taught in law schools discussed in law reviews shaped legal standards cited in court opinions |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
important precedent
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
yes
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
high
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Johnson
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith |
| gptkbp:research |
direct evidence
circumstantial evidence |
| gptkbp:tactics |
innocence
self-defense intent guilt beyond reasonable doubt |