Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
yes
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
21-1234
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkb:United_States_District_Court |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Huber
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced legislative changes
influenced public policy influenced jury instructions clarified legal definitions influenced legal scholarship revised legal interpretations influenced public opinion on crime affected judicial discretion altered defense tactics shaped law enforcement practices shaped future litigation affected civil rights advocacy affected community policing policies affected human rights advocacy affected media coverage of legal issues affected plea bargains changed legal education changed prosecutorial strategies influenced international law discussions influenced sentencing reforms redefined legal standards revised appellate review processes set new precedents shaped criminal justice reform shaped political discourse on justice |
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States
Huber |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Smith
Judge_Doe |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
due process public defender burden of proof reasonable doubt double jeopardy prosecutor |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Johnson
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on sentencing guidelines
|
| gptkbp:year |
2021
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
March 15, 2021
June 1, 2021 |