Statements (61)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
majority opinion dissenting opinion |
| gptkbp:date |
March 15, 2020
June 1, 2020 |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Hinds
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal justice reform
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
Hinds |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
gptkb:Miranda_rights
criminal law community service rehabilitation programs fair trial right to appeal due process constitutional amendments plea bargaining witness testimony exclusionary rule search and seizure expert testimony recidivism rates right to counsel sentencing guidelines self-incrimination burden of proof prosecutorial discretion double jeopardy discovery process restorative justice victim impact statements judicial bias ineffective assistance of counsel international law considerations harmless error evidence admissibility post-conviction relief prosecutorial misconduct civil rights implications jury instructions standard of review appeal rights victim's rights proportionality in sentencing sentencing enhancements pretrial motions confrontation clause criminal record expungement bail and detention collateral consequences |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
government attorney |
| gptkbp:outcome |
appeal granted
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influential case
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Johnson
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith |