Properties (82)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
conviction
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12345
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
majority opinion dissenting opinion |
| gptkbp:date |
March 10, 2020
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
January 15, 2020
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Hargis
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal justice
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
Hargis |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith gptkb:Judge_Johnson |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
due process evidence admissibility |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defense attorney
constitutional issues prosecutor statutory interpretation |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
settlement
contract defense judgment negligence settlement agreement venue case law appeal process defendant litigation plaintiff statutory law common law testimony judicial discretion liability expert witness damages legal precedent cross-examination discovery federal jurisdiction burden of proof verdict witness state jurisdiction appellate review oral argument reversal tort deposition injunction briefing harmless error class action subpoena jury instructions opening statement standard of review remand amicus curiae remedy prejudicial error direct examination pro se affirmance closing argument |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
important precedent
summary of facts summary of ruling summary of implications |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
appeal decision |
| gptkbp:precedent |
case law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones |