United States v. Hall

GPTKB entity

Properties (47)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf court case
gptkbp:applicationNumber No. 69-1
gptkbp:caseOutcome upheld constitutional rights
set legal standards
defendant's rights upheld
gptkbp:caseTypes constitutional law
gptkbp:citedBy 421 U.S. 1
gptkbp:court gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
unanimous decision
established guidelines for police conduct
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 21, 1970
gptkbp:filedIn November 18, 1969
gptkbp:historicalContext gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement_era
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. Hall
gptkbp:impact influenced_future_Fourth_Amendment_cases
gptkbp:influenced law_enforcement_practices
gptkbp:judges Justice Harry Blackmun
reversed lower court ruling
majority opinion emphasized privacy rights
dissent raised concerns about law enforcement
reviewed by lower courts
gptkbp:legalStatus gptkb:U.S._Attorney_General
criminal law
exclusionary rule
constitutional interpretation
defense attorney for Hall
Fourth_Amendment_rights
strengthened_Fourth_Amendment_protections
gptkbp:notableFeature still cited in legal arguments
analyzed by legal scholars
available in legal databases
used in law schools
important for civil liberties
summarized in legal textbooks
involves search and seizure issues.
gptkbp:outcome affirmed lower court's decision
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation gptkb:United_States
Hall
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkbp:precedent subsequent cases involving search warrants
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
affects current law enforcement policies
gptkbp:relatedTo Fourth Amendment
gptkbp:significance established precedent on search and seizure
gptkbp:year 1970