|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
innovation
free market principles
no antitrust violation
|
|
gptkbp:case_observers
|
gptkb:politicians
economists
business leaders
legal experts
consumer advocates
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
not yet decided
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
|
|
gptkbp:clinical_trial
|
TBD
to be determined
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
for antitrust law
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Google_LLC
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
gptkb:United_States_Department_of_Justice
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
gptkb:2020
|
|
gptkbp:duration
|
high
|
|
gptkbp:economic_impact
|
data privacy
advertising costs
search results
|
|
gptkbp:google's_market_share
|
over 90% in search
|
|
gptkbp:google's_position
|
competition is healthy
|
|
gptkbp:google's_response
|
denial of wrongdoing
denies wrongdoing
commitment to competition
defense of practices
|
|
gptkbp:government
|
Google has monopoly power
|
|
gptkbp:government_stance
|
consumer protection
pro-competition
|
|
gptkbp:has_meetings
|
evidence presentation
scheduled
expert witnesses
testimonies
stakeholder input
held
|
|
gptkbp:historical_period
|
ongoing
|
|
gptkbp:historical_significance
|
for global tech regulation
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Google LLC
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
search engine market
digital advertising market
|
|
gptkbp:impact_on_google
|
gptkb:business_practices
revenue
stock price
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Google_LLC
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_basis_for
|
gptkb:Sherman_Act
|
|
gptkbp:is_applied_in
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:is_debated_in
|
monopolistic practices
antitrust violations
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
antitrust
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Katherine_A._Hsu
gptkb:David_C._Frederick
various law firms
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:American_Innovation_and_Choice_Online_Act
proposed antitrust bills
Platform Competition and Opportunity Act
|
|
gptkbp:major_city
|
ongoing
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:number_of_states_involved
|
11 states
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
pending
fines
increased regulation
settlement or trial
changes in business model
market restructuring
|
|
gptkbp:potential_penalties
|
fines or structural changes
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
antitrust law
potential implications for tech industry
|
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
high
consumer choice
market competition
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
varied
consumer behavior
divided
market dynamics
regulatory challenges
antitrust implications
|
|
gptkbp:publication_year
|
October 2020
October 20, 2020
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Microsoft_Corporation
other antitrust cases against tech companies
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
market dominance
|
|
gptkbp:state
|
gptkb:California
gptkb:Colorado
gptkb:Florida
gptkb:Illinois
gptkb:New_York
gptkb:North_Carolina
gptkb:Tennessee
gptkb:Texas
gptkb:Virginia
gptkb:Massachusetts
|
|
gptkbp:testimonials
|
presented
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
internal documents
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Google
gptkb:the_U._S._Department_of_Justice
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|