United States v. DoorDash Inc.
GPTKB entity
Properties (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil
20-cv-12345 |
| gptkbp:claims |
misclassification of workers
|
| gptkbp:commissionDate |
March 2021
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
worker rights
fair pay |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:DoorDash_Inc. gptkb:U.S._District_Court |
| gptkbp:date |
2020
|
| gptkbp:filedIn |
gptkb:Department_of_Labor
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
January 2020
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. DoorDash Inc.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
delivery workers
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:DoorDash_Inc. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
wage theft
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:U.S._government
DoorDash's_legal_team |
| gptkbp:legislation |
Fair Labor Standards Act
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
high
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
$2.5 million
employment law policy changes public policy social justice industry standards consumer rights economic justice regulatory scrutiny labor rights compliance measures employment status minimum wage laws penalties national attention business ethics legal precedent labor market dynamics corporate responsibility social implications economic implications worker benefits worker advocacy worker compensation future litigation worker classification standards back wages business model impact contractor vs employee debate gig worker protections |
| gptkbp:outcome |
settlement
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
worker classification
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gig economy
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Uber_Technologies,_Inc._v._Berwick
Lyft,_Inc._v._California |