Properties (52)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-1003
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
2022 U.S. LEXIS 1234
|
gptkbp:controversy |
November 2021
|
gptkbp:court |
majority opinion
limited federal intervention upheld state regulations supported state autonomy |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
February 2022 |
gptkbp:historical_analysis |
numerous publications
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Delaware
|
gptkbp:impact |
state-federal relations
|
gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
State of Delaware |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Thomas Supreme_Court_authority |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
interstate commerce
federal jurisdiction |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
gptkb:Delaware_Attorney_General impact on future cases judicial precedent interpretation of statutes |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
environmental law
federalism |
gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Federal_Water_Pollution_Control_Act
Clean Water Act |
gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive coverage
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
environmental policy
federal oversight state rights influences future legislation affects environmental regulations high-profile legal battle addresses state-federal conflicts affects federal enforcement affects state compliance examines jurisdictional boundaries high stakes for environmental policy impacts federal regulatory authority important environmental case involves federalism issues relevant to other states' regulations significant_for_Delaware's_interests |
gptkbp:outcome |
ruling_in_favor_of_Delaware
|
gptkbp:precedent |
affects state sovereignty
|
gptkbp:public_perception |
mixed reactions
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Texas
|
gptkbp:significance |
clarifies federal authority
|
gptkbp:year |
2021
|