Statements (62)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
from district court
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
19-1234
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
No. 19-1234
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
majority opinion dissenting opinion concurring opinion |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. DeLuca
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced future rulings
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
DeLuca |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith gptkb:Judge_Johnson |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
prosecutor interpretation of statutes review of evidence application of precedents |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
defendant
plaintiff appellant appellee federal criminal procedure |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
analysis of legal frameworks
affects sentencing guidelines analysis of legal arguments summary of facts affects plea deals analysis of statutory interpretation analysis of judicial discretion analysis of judicial reasoning analysis of procedural fairness summary of arguments impact on similar cases analysis of legal outcomes analysis of legal doctrines analysis of case law affects trial procedures analysis of appellate review analysis of constitutional issues analysis of evidentiary issues analysis of judicial interpretations analysis of judicial outcomes analysis of judicial review analysis of legal challenges analysis of legal ethics analysis of legal precedent analysis of legal principles analysis of legal remedies analysis of legal standards analysis of public policy implications summary of decision analysis_of_factual_findings |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal principles
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Johnson
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith |