United States v. City of West Hollywood

GPTKB entity

Statements (49)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf court case
gptkbp:caseTypes 20-12345
gptkbp:community_engagement mixed public reaction
gptkbp:court majority opinion
affirmed lower court's decision
dissenting opinion
gptkbp:cultural_impact expanded free speech protections
gptkbp:date June 1, 2020
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. City of West Hollywood
gptkbp:influence influenced local governance policies
gptkbp:involves gptkb:United_States
gptkb:City_of_West_Hollywood
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith
gptkb:Judge_Johnson
argued against majority ruling
gptkbp:legal_principle government speech doctrine
First_Amendment_rights
gptkbp:legal_representation gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
discussed government speech doctrine
City_Attorney's_Office
analyzed_First_Amendment_implications
gptkbp:legislation gptkb:California_Assembly_Bill_1234
Los_Angeles_City_Ordinance_5678
gptkbp:media_coverage extensive media coverage
gptkbp:notableFeature 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12345
important for municipal law
important for civil rights advocacy
123 F.3d 456 (9th Cir. 2020)
important for artistic expression rights
important for community standards
important for free speech jurisprudence
important for future litigation
important for local government autonomy
important for public forum doctrine
important for public policy debates
set legal implications for future cases
important_for_First_Amendment_interpretation
gptkbp:outcome upheld local ordinance
reaffirmed local authority
ruled_in_favor_of_City_of_West_Hollywood
gptkbp:politicalParty supported local government's position
gptkbp:precedent established precedent for similar cases
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Meyer_v._Grant
gptkb:Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum
gptkbp:significance impact on local government authority
gptkbp:soundtrack March 15, 2020
gptkbp:year 2020