gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
2:04-cv-00012
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
enforcement of federal regulations
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
January 2005
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Charlotte County
|
gptkbp:impact
|
local government regulations
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
United States and Charlotte County
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:Charlotte_County
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
2005 WL 1234567
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
zoning laws
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
federal supremacy
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Police_Department
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
administrative law
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
favor of United States
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
related to federal authority
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._County_of_Los_Angeles
|
gptkbp:significance
|
federal vs. state authority
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2005
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_Florida
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|