Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
denied
federal conviction |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
09-10000
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
March 2010
|
| gptkbp:convictedOf |
felony
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_rights not guilty majority opinion evidence was admissible published opinion affirmed conviction due process violation sufficient evidence affirmed lower court future drug cases reduced on appeal sufficient grounds for conviction Cardenas |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2010
three-judge panel |
| gptkbp:homeGround |
drug-related offenses
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Cardenas
|
| gptkbp:impact |
drug enforcement policy
|
| gptkbp:involved |
drug trafficking
|
| gptkbp:judges |
appellate review
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
federal appellate jurisdiction |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
sentencing guidelines
evidence admissibility |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
court-appointed attorney |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
beyond a reasonable doubt
ineffective assistance of counsel federal sentencing guidelines federal criminal procedure |
| gptkbp:length |
10 years
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
criminal justice system
legal precedent impact on future cases criminal defense drug policy reform sentencing reform drug conspiracy drug trafficking laws drug trafficking conviction 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12345 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
upheld conviction legal ramifications affirmed by appellate court |
| gptkbp:precedent |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
federal_judiciary
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Lopez
|
| gptkbp:research |
wiretap evidence
|
| gptkbp:significance |
federal drug laws
|
| gptkbp:tactics |
plea bargain
|