Properties (60)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:appeal |
defendant's conviction
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
19-1234
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
No. 19-1234
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
C._Wright |
gptkbp:date |
April 20, 2020
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. C. Wright
|
gptkbp:impact |
Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence
|
gptkbp:involved |
criminal law
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith gptkb:Judge_Johnson |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
exclusionary rule
search and seizure reasonable expectation of privacy Fourth_Amendment_rights |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
prosecutor |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
important for legal ethics
important for legal reform important for civil liberties important for civil rights important for legal history important for legal precedents important for legal education important for public policy important for constitutional law important for public understanding of law important for judicial review important for privacy rights important for legal standards important for criminal procedure important for appellate review important for constitutional protections important for due process important for evidence law important for government authority important for individual liberties important for judicial authority important for judicial interpretation important for law enforcement important for law interpretation important for legal accountability important for legal challenges important for legal discourse important for legal rights important for legal scholarship important for search and seizure law |
gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
upheld conviction |
gptkbp:precedent |
established legal standards
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones |
gptkbp:research |
warrantless search
consent to search |
gptkbp:soundtrack |
March 15, 2020
|
gptkbp:state |
gptkb:California
|