Properties (57)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
District_Court
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
00-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
affirmed
upheld conviction impact on legal standards rejected appeal affirmed lower court decision reaffirmed legal standards |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
2000-1234 federal criminal case |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
123 F.3d 456
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
implications for defendants
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Washington,_D.C. gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals majority opinion dissenting opinion Bennett |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
Judges
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
background of the case
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Bennett
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced sentencing reforms
|
| gptkbp:judges |
appellate review
upheld lower court ruling three-judge panel |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
defense attorney beyond a reasonable doubt principle of legality conviction upheld prosecutor insufficient evidence improper jury instructions ineffective assistance of counsel cited in future cases context of the law framework of criminal law |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
analysis of legal arguments
summary of legal findings details of the trial important for sentencing guidelines relevant to criminal procedure significant for appellate law |
| gptkbp:outcome |
appeal denied
|
| gptkbp:party |
gptkb:United_States
Bennett |
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal principles
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Johnson
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith |
| gptkbp:research |
circumstantial evidence
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on future cases
|
| gptkbp:year |
2000
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
March 15, 2000
June 1, 2000 |