Statements (112)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:argued_on |
lack of wrongdoing
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
future antitrust enforcement
current banking practices impact on banking sector analysis of settlement study of antitrust issues |
gptkbp:case_findings |
findings of the court
|
gptkbp:case_number |
court records
details of the case 1:15-cv-00099 15-cv-00001 summary of allegations |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
settlement agreement
dismissed legal implications resolved dismissal of claims increased scrutiny of banks terms of settlement summary of settlement terms |
gptkbp:case_significance |
high-profile antitrust case
significance in legal terms |
gptkbp:case_types |
civil
antitrust litigation antitrust case |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Southern_District_of_New_York
gptkb:New_York gptkb:United_States gptkb:United_States_District_Court gptkb:Barclays_Bank_PLC |
gptkbp:date_settled |
March 2016
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
gptkbp:economic_impact |
$100 million settlement
|
gptkbp:effective_date |
March 1, 2015
|
gptkbp:filing_type |
civil
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Barclays
|
gptkbp:impact |
banking regulations
financial industry regulations |
gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Barclays
gptkb:United_States |
gptkbp:is_debated_in |
collusion
manipulation of interest rates |
gptkbp:judged_by |
judgment details
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_John_Doe
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
federal |
gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Crisis_intervention
gptkb:financial_crisis_of_2008 financial regulations regulatory frameworks regulatory scrutiny financial market integrity government oversight banking sector reforms financial ethics corporate governance issues international banking standards context of the case consumer rights advocacy financial market stability financial institution accountability market manipulation cases financial consumer protection laws financial market regulations banking industry practices banking compliance requirements banking sector accountability antitrust litigation trends antitrust policy changes antitrust enforcement history economic impact of banking practices financial compliance challenges litigation trends in finance market competition laws |
gptkbp:legal_framework |
antitrust law
framework of antitrust law |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
antitrust laws
antitrust violations |
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
settlement reached
outcome of the case fines imposed compliance measures required |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Police_Department
legal analysis of the case |
gptkbp:major_city |
$100 million
monitoring compliance monitoring by third party |
gptkbp:material |
financial misconduct allegations
|
gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:Roman_settlement
|
gptkbp:plaintiff_argument |
anti-competitive practices
|
gptkbp:precedent |
antitrust enforcement
influences future cases antitrust law cases precedent set by the case |
gptkbp:public_interest |
consumer protection
market integrity |
gptkbp:publication_year |
January 5, 2015
January 7, 2015 |
gptkbp:regulatory_focus |
banking regulations
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Goldman_Sachs
gptkb:United_States_v._Deutsche_Bank gptkb:United_States_v._Citigroup United States v. JPMorgan Chase |
gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:financial_services
financial services industry |
gptkbp:resolution |
March 1, 2015
settlement reached |
gptkbp:significance |
enforcement of antitrust laws
antitrust compliance deterrent effect on banks |
gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2015
|