Properties (66)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
18-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
17-1234
|
| gptkbp:court |
appellate court
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 25, 2018 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
March 5, 2018
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Allen
|
| gptkbp:impact |
public policy
social justice access to justice case management civil rights judicial independence legal education legal research court funding judicial efficiency constitutional law judicial review legal reforms appeals process case law legal accountability legal precedents legal standards defense strategies community relations criminal justice system legal advocacy court procedures victim rights sentencing guidelines judicial transparency legal ethics law reform prosecutorial discretion courtroom decorum public trust in the legal system evidence admissibility public perception of justice defendant rights courtroom technology legal representation quality defendant rehabilitation law_enforcement_practices |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
Allen |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Alito gptkb:Justice_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Thomas gptkb:Justice_Kagan gptkb:Justice_Ginsburg Justice Breyer |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
fair trial due process public defender right to counsel |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influences future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Smith
|
| gptkbp:significance |
affirms lower court ruling
|
| gptkbp:year |
2018
|