gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Antitrust_Act_of_1890
|
gptkbp:area
|
competition law
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
gptkb:legislation
appealed from lower court
antitrust case
part of U. S. legal history
No. 1, 1898
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
gptkb:sports_event
shaped future antitrust cases
shaped antitrust policy
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Cincinnati,_Ohio
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
1899-01-09
|
gptkbp:duration
|
1898-1899
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
gptkb:late_19th_century
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.
|
gptkbp:impact
|
gptkb:technique
|
gptkbp:industry
|
manufacturing
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
85 F. 271
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day
|
gptkbp:judging_criteria
|
judgment for the United States
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
fair competition
restraint of trade
antitrust framework
antitrust enforcement history
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
monopolistic practices
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Clayton_Antitrust_Act
|
gptkbp:market
|
pipe manufacturing
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
gptkb:Northern_Securities_Co._v._United_States
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
gptkb:memorial
gptkb:majority_opinion
business regulations
affirmed
unanimous
upheld lower court's ruling
influenced future antitrust legislation
prohibition of anti-competitive practices
increased scrutiny of monopolies
upheld antitrust laws
current antitrust discussions
important antitrust ruling
affected corporate behavior
collusion found
prohibition of collusion
|
gptkbp:party
|
gptkb:Addyston_Pipe_&_Steel_Company
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Trans-Missouri_Freight_Ass'n
subsequent antitrust cases
established legal precedent
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:none
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
|
gptkbp:resolution
|
resolved in favor of United States
|
gptkbp:significance
|
antitrust law
early antitrust enforcement
|