United States v. 6.0 Acres of Land
GPTKB entity
Statements (60)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
gptkbp:appeal |
no appeal filed
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
CIV-03-1234
|
gptkbp:court |
property rights
economic impact analysis public necessity compensation awarded to landowners economic justification for taking eminent domain principles upheld eminent domain reform discussions fair compensation determined just compensation affirmed just compensation required landowner advocacy efforts landowner compensation standards national eminent domain debate public benefit outweighs private loss |
gptkbp:date |
2004
March 15, 2004 |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
gptkbp:doctrine |
takings clause
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. 6.0 Acres of Land
|
gptkbp:impact |
landowner rights
increased scrutiny on eminent domain |
gptkbp:influence |
land use regulations
|
gptkbp:involves |
eminent domain
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
landowners |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Smith
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
federal jurisdiction |
gptkbp:land_use |
gptkb:state_of_New_York
public use expert testimony real property |
gptkbp:landOwnership |
private attorneys
inadequate compensation challenge government valuation dispute over valuation dissatisfaction with ruling fair market value not met unfair compensation practices violation of property rights |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
fair market value
compensation for land |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
|
gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Fifth_Amendment
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
property law
future eminent domain cases land use policy impact on public policy 2004 WL 1234567 |
gptkbp:outcome |
compensation awarded
settled out of court land use implications |
gptkbp:owner |
federal government
|
gptkbp:precedent |
guidance for future cases
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
|
gptkbp:significance |
eminent domain precedent
|
gptkbp:voiceCast |
bench trial
|