United States v. 6.0 Acres of Land

GPTKB entity

Statements (60)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf court case
gptkbp:appeal no appeal filed
gptkbp:caseTypes CIV-03-1234
gptkbp:court property rights
economic impact analysis
public necessity
compensation awarded to landowners
economic justification for taking
eminent domain principles upheld
eminent domain reform discussions
fair compensation determined
just compensation affirmed
just compensation required
landowner advocacy efforts
landowner compensation standards
national eminent domain debate
public benefit outweighs private loss
gptkbp:date 2004
March 15, 2004
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:United_States_District_Court
gptkbp:doctrine takings clause
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. 6.0 Acres of Land
gptkbp:impact landowner rights
increased scrutiny on eminent domain
gptkbp:influence land use regulations
gptkbp:involves eminent domain
gptkbp:is_involved_in gptkb:United_States
landowners
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Judge_Smith
gptkbp:jurisdiction federal
federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:land_use gptkb:state_of_New_York
public use
expert testimony
real property
gptkbp:landOwnership private attorneys
inadequate compensation
challenge government valuation
dispute over valuation
dissatisfaction with ruling
fair market value not met
unfair compensation practices
violation of property rights
gptkbp:legal_principle fair market value
compensation for land
gptkbp:legal_representation gptkb:Department_of_Justice
gptkbp:legislation gptkb:Fifth_Amendment
gptkbp:notableFeature property law
future eminent domain cases
land use policy
impact on public policy
2004 WL 1234567
gptkbp:outcome compensation awarded
settled out of court
land use implications
gptkbp:owner federal government
gptkbp:precedent guidance for future cases
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
gptkbp:significance eminent domain precedent
gptkbp:voiceCast bench trial