Properties (82)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:advocatesFor |
1 hour
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
21-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Summary of legal analysis.
Summary of legal implications. Judicial impact assessed. Outcome details published. Public interest assessed. Public reaction analyzed. Ruling in favor of petitioner. Summary of outcome published. Summary of public interest. Summary of public reaction. Reviewed_by_Supreme_Court. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Summary of judicial impact.
Summary of judicial review. 147369258 Summary of analysis published. Summary of impact published. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influences future discrimination cases.
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
Conservative majority Sets judicial precedent. |
| gptkbp:date |
2023-06-30
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:description |
The case addresses issues of discrimination.
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Numerous articles published.
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Summary of historical context.
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Historical context provided.
History of the case documented. |
| gptkbp:historicalSignificance |
Landmark case
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
Background involves civil rights issues.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
US 147369258 V
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Significant impact on civil rights
|
| gptkbp:isAimedAt |
gptkb:National_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Colored_People
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union Example Law Firm |
| gptkbp:judges |
Yes
Majority opinion published. Dissenting opinion published. Significant judicial impact. Justice_Johnson |
| gptkbp:lawEnforcement |
Underwent judicial review process.
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Extensive legal analysis conducted.
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitutional law
2023-04-15 Equal protection under the law 147 S. Ct. 1234 (2023) Arguments presented by both sides. Context within legal system. Establishes legal precedent. Part of legal framework. |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive media coverage.
Media coverage analyzed. Summary of media coverage. |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Influenced new legislation.
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Decided
Documented in legal archives. Extensive documentation available. Reviewed by legal experts. Detailed case analysis available. Judicial review conducted. Significant for future cases. Summary of significance published. Used as case study in law schools. |
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
Respondent: State of Example
Petitioner:_John_Doe |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Smith
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Yes
Binding precedent |
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed reactions
High public interest. |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Summary of legal context.
Context within legal system. Implications for future law. US_123456789_V |
| gptkbp:team |
Summary of legal framework.
Legal implications discussed. Judicial precedent established. Legal analysis performed. Part of legal framework. |
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4
|