|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
Supreme Court judgment
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:(2017)_9_SCC_1
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:India
|
|
gptkbp:deliveredBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingJudgmentBy
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_J._S._Khehar
gptkb:Justice_S._Abdul_Nazeer
|
|
gptkbp:effect
|
Practice of instant triple talaq banned in India
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Triple Talaq Judgment
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Strengthened rights of Muslim women in India
|
|
gptkbp:judgmentDate
|
2017-08-22
|
|
gptkbp:language
|
English
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Kurian_Joseph
gptkb:Justice_Rohinton_Fali_Nariman
gptkb:Justice_Uday_Umesh_Lalit
|
|
gptkbp:mediaCoverage
|
Extensive national and international coverage
|
|
gptkbp:numberOfIssues
|
Constitutionality of instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat)
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Shayara_Bano_v._Union_of_India
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Shayara_Bano
|
|
gptkbp:popularFor
|
gptkb:Triple_Talaq_Case
|
|
gptkbp:powers
|
5
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
Muslim personal law reforms in India
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Violation of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India
|
|
gptkbp:relatedLegislation
|
gptkb:Muslim_Women_(Protection_of_Rights_on_Marriage)_Act,_2019
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
Danial Latifi v. Union of India
Shamim Ara v. State of UP
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Union_of_India
|
|
gptkbp:verdict
|
Instant triple talaq declared unconstitutional
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Triple_Talaq_Case
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|