Statements (22)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:Legal_Doctrine
|
| gptkbp:category |
Indian Constitutional Law
|
| gptkbp:concerns |
Appointment of Judges
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:India
|
| gptkbp:effect |
Established Collegium System
Limited Executive Power in Judicial Appointments |
| gptkbp:establishedBy |
Supreme Court Judgments
|
| gptkbp:First_Judges_Case |
S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Collegium System
|
| gptkbp:includes |
gptkb:Second_Judges_Case
Third Judges Case First Judges Case |
| gptkbp:period |
1981-1998
|
| gptkbp:principle |
Judicial Independence
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Indian_Judiciary
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India |
| gptkbp:Second_Judges_Case |
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (1993)
|
| gptkbp:subject |
Interpretation of Article 124 and Article 217 of Indian Constitution
|
| gptkbp:Third_Judges_Case |
In re Presidential Reference (1998)
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Collegium_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
9
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Three Judges Cases
|