Statements (19)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:alsoKnownAs |
Ayodhya Reference Case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
1994 SCC (6) 360
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:India
|
| gptkbp:date |
24 October 1994
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
M. Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
The Ayodhya Reference
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced later Ayodhya land dispute cases
|
| gptkbp:leadJudgementBy |
Justice J.S. Verma
|
| gptkbp:numberOfIssues |
Whether a mosque is an essential part of Islamic practice
Constitutionality of the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993 |
| gptkbp:powers |
5-judge Constitution Bench
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Ayodhya_dispute
gptkb:Babri_Masjid |
| gptkbp:verdict |
Acquisition of religious property by the state is constitutional
Mosque is not an essential part of the practice of Islam |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Swapan_Dasgupta
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|