Statements (22)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
(2002) 8 SCC 481
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:India
|
| gptkbp:date |
2002-10-31
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:followedBy |
gptkb:Islamic_Academy_of_Education_v._State_of_Karnataka
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
TMA Pai Foundation case
|
| gptkbp:key |
Private unaided educational institutions have autonomy in administration
State can regulate admissions to ensure merit and transparency Minority institutions have special rights under Article 30 |
| gptkbp:language |
English
|
| gptkbp:officialName |
T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
T.M.A. Pai Foundation
|
| gptkbp:powers |
11-judge bench
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Right to Education
Minority educational institutions Article 30 of the Indian Constitution Autonomy of private educational institutions |
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:State_of_Karnataka
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Fali_Nariman
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|