Statements (20)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
English law
nuisance case |
| gptkbp:citation |
(1879) 11 Ch D 852
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
1879
|
| gptkbp:defendant |
gptkb:Mr._Sturges
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
Plaintiff entitled to injunction against nuisance
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Sturges v Bridgman
|
| gptkbp:importantFor |
Leading case on nuisance in English law
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Thesiger_LJ
High Court of Justice |
| gptkbp:legalDefinition |
locality principle
sensitivity of claimant |
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
gptkb:Dr._Bridgman
|
| gptkbp:plotSummary |
A doctor sued a confectioner for noise and vibration from machinery.
|
| gptkbp:principle |
coming to the nuisance is not a defense
|
| gptkbp:referencedIn |
gptkb:English_tort_law
|
| gptkbp:subject |
private nuisance
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Miller_v_Jackson
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|