Stencel Aero Engineering Corp.
GPTKB entity
Statements (81)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Company
gptkb:legal_case |
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Federal_Claims
Legal Error |
| gptkbp:area |
gptkb:Contract_Law
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Reviewed by legal scholars.
Affects government contracting practices. Relevant for future contract negotiations. |
| gptkbp:case_legal_contextualization |
Contextualized within broader legal issues.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_documentation |
Documented in legal reports.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_interpretation |
Interpreted by courts.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_relevance |
Relevant for legal practitioners.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_review |
Reviewed by legal experts.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Available in legal databases.
92-5054 Appealed from the Court of Federal Claims. Dispute over contract performance. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:Affirmed
Closed Reviewed by appellate court. Affects future government contracts. Court upheld lower court's ruling. Influences contract law. No liability found. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Details on its significance in law.
Important for government contractors. Important for understanding government contracts. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil Case
Presented by both parties. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Implications for contract enforcement.
Influenced future contract disputes. Significant impact on contract law. |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
Appeal Decision |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
92-5054
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
April 20, 1993
|
| gptkbp:final_decision_date |
1993-04-20
|
| gptkbp:founded |
gptkb:1969
|
| gptkbp:founder |
Robert Stencel
|
| gptkbp:headquarters |
gptkb:Huntington_Beach,_California
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Stencel Aero Engineering Corp.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Government Contracting
|
| gptkbp:industry |
Aerospace
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Stencel_Aero_Engineering_Corp. |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
No. 92-5054
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith Judge Johnson |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal Jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:key_people |
Robert Stencel
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Contextualized within contract law.
Government Contract Law. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Details on its role in legal frameworks.
Part of the legal framework for contracts. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Breach of Contract
Established key legal principles. |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Detailed in legal summaries.
Final ruling in favor of the government. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Contractual Obligations
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Law_Firm_XYZ
Analyzed for legal implications. |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Federal_Acquisition_Regulation
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Judgment for the United States
No damages awarded. |
| gptkbp:parent_company |
Stencel Aerospace
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Federal_Tort_Claims_Act
Set a precedent for future cases. Clarified standards for breach of contract. Used in subsequent cases. |
| gptkbp:products |
Aircraft components
|
| gptkbp:publication_year |
1992-01-15
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
Aerojet-General Corp. v. United States
United States v. Mc Donnell Douglas Corp. |
| gptkbp:services |
Engineering services
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified liability under government contracts.
|
| gptkbp:website |
www.stencelaero.com
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1993
|