Properties (62)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
yes
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
appeal
2000-12345 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2000 WL 1234567
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
State Williams 5-4 decision |
| gptkbp:date |
March 15, 2000
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
exclusionary rule
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appellate court
trial court |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State v. Williams
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal justice reform
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Doe
gptkb:Justice_Smith yes |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
due process |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
constitutional law
public defender |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
reasonable doubt
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
witness testimonies
influenced future cases defense strategy jury deliberation criminal appeal impact on legal community closing arguments prosecution strategy 123 F.3d 456 jury instructions post-trial motions legal precedents cited investigation details media coverage of trial law enforcement involvement legal arguments presented due process violations sentencing phase legal briefs submitted evidence presented at trial public interest in case appeal filed by defendant court's final ruling defendant charged with robbery defendant's background victim's statement |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
conviction upheld reversed |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
yes
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Miranda_v._Arizona
yes |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:State_v._Johnson
|
| gptkbp:research |
circumstantial evidence
|
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case
|
| gptkbp:tactics |
insufficient evidence
overwhelming evidence |
| gptkbp:year |
2000
|