Statements (15)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:citation |
359 Or 756
375 P.3d 434 |
| gptkbp:date |
2016
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
Veterinary blood test on a dog lawfully seized does not violate the Oregon Constitution's search and seizure protections.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State v. Newcomb
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Oregon_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Oregon
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
gptkb:State_of_Oregon
|
| gptkbp:response |
Allison Newcomb
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified the status of animals as property and the scope of constitutional protections in animal cruelty investigations.
|
| gptkbp:subject |
animal law
search and seizure |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Animal_Law
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|