Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
90-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
appeal
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
123 F.3d 456
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
gptkb:State_of_New_Jersey McMillan |
| gptkbp:date |
March 15, 1990
June 1, 1990 |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State v. McMillan
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal justice reform
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Doe
gptkb:Justice_Smith |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
due process right to counsel double jeopardy |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
influenced legal standards
precedent for future cases court's interpretation of law defendant appealed conviction discussed implications for defendants discussed implications for law enforcement reviewed appellate court's reasoning highlighted racial disparities highlighted systemic issues examined police procedures examined legal precedents assessed judicial discretion considered victim advocacy debated legal ethics addressed community relations addressed prosecutorial conduct analyzed legal arguments analyzed trial fairness analyzed trial outcomes considered future legal reforms considered public safety considered victim's rights defendant's rights questioned discussed constitutional implications discussed jury instructions evaluated evidence sufficiency examined appellate review process examined legal representation quality involves a robbery issues of evidence admission reflected on community impact reflected on judicial accountability reviewed sentencing practices |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal principles
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
controversial
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:State_v._Johnson
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on sentencing guidelines
|
| gptkbp:year |
1990
|