|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
legal case
|
|
gptkbp:appeal
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:applicationNumber
|
12345
|
|
gptkbp:caseTypes
|
criminal
|
|
gptkbp:citedBy
|
2005 WL 1234567
|
|
gptkbp:community_engagement
|
high
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:John_Doe
gptkb:Supreme_Court
gptkb:Jane_Roe
unanimous
strict scrutiny
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
March 15, 2005
|
|
gptkbp:doctrine
|
best interests of the child
|
|
gptkbp:future_plans
|
influential
|
|
gptkbp:historical_analysis
|
ongoing
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
State v. J.P.
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
yes
juvenile sentencing
|
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in
|
gptkb:State_of_New_Jersey
J.P.
|
|
gptkbp:issues
|
Fourth Amendment
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_Smith
no
yes
published
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
due process
juvenile justice
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
public defender
varied opinions
|
|
gptkbp:legalStatus
|
criminal justice system
juvenile law reform
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:notableFeature
|
important
significant
landmark case
thorough
juvenile rights
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
closed
reversed
remanded
precedent-setting
|
|
gptkbp:politicalParty
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
yes
established
cited frequently
|
|
gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_New_Jersey
|
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent
|
gptkb:State_v._A.B.
|
|
gptkbp:research
|
witness testimony
documentary evidence
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on juvenile law
|
|
gptkbp:submissionDeadline
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:voiceCast
|
oral argument
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
2005
|